deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
Shop Similar Prints
This Print Not Available
more ▶

More from ~besnglist

Featured in Groups:

Details

February 16, 2012
355 KB
824×493
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 14
Favourites: 29 [who?]

Views: 399 (1 today)

Camera Data

[x]
:iconbesnglist:
Pin-ups from 1900 are made by Rotring technical pen. It's fun, for a change.

And I haven't got a clue why it looks so blur here on dA :B
Add a Comment:
 
love 0 0 joy 1 1 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconcluedog:
*cluedog Feb 19, 2012  Professional Traditional Artist
I could stare at the sheer beauty of the hatchwork and imagery of the lower right two panels all day. However, it's all great work.
Reply
:iconbesnglist:
Thank you Zac! Those two panels are more art nouveau, and everybody likes art nouveau - me included :)
Reply
:iconcluedog:
*cluedog Feb 22, 2012  Professional Traditional Artist
I love art nouveau, as well. It's art of an almost lyrical nature.
Reply
:iconbesnglist:
Sure, it just takes a lot of precision to make such lyrical effects. Not really my cup of tea, but as an observer, I'm allowed to enjoy it :)
Reply
:iconmoriadat:
~Moriadat Feb 18, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
Agreed. The last two shine.

I used to use Rotring's in Burned Oak, btw. They allow lovely details, but used to clog all the time. What resolution are these scans? 72 dpi WILL seem blur fine linework. Are these reduced from the original size, or enlarged? Enlarging might result in blur as well.
Reply
:iconbesnglist:
Yep, I made a conclusion that it shines only if done on small surfaces, like on a panel or two. Craw quill rules when it comes to larger pieces or more expressive stuff. BTW, what tool are you using on the last Prayground pages? Cuz I really love the way they're made.

I believe I just posted this one in original resolution, 300 dpi (don't laugh please, I know it's too big). I also tried the smaller resolution before, and it all just looks blur here. The original format is like A4 approximately. I also noticed that vertical page layouts don't get blur, while horizontal ones do. It's probably just the mater of dA, but it pisses me off regularly.
Reply
:iconmoriadat:
~Moriadat Feb 18, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
I'm using Unipin pens of varying widths: .3 for fine details, .5 for midrange stuff, .8 for the bold lines. Coulouring in the black areas with a Nikko pen, mostly out of laziness :) They'll look like a dog's breakfast in ten years (the black bits I mean) but because Unipins are fadeproof, the detailed areas will still look fine.

300 dpi is the resolution you want to use for detailed artwork, when scanning. But for displaying on the net, you want 72 dpi. When you reduce the dpi from 300 to 72dpi, the image size changes automatically as well, but you can change it back to a decent size to better preserve the details. (I downloaded Ulysses pg12 just to check its dimensions, and its about 900 pixels wide) I reckon if you restore the width to, say, 1200 pixels, you'll lose a lot of that blur.

For example, I scan my pages into Photoshop at 300 dpi. They're usually something crazy like 2500 pixels x 4800 pixels. I add my word balloons and sound effects, flatten the image, then reduce the resolution to 72 dpi, which reduces the image to something lousy like 400 x 600 pixels (which is useless for detail preservation) so I increase that back to about 800 x 1080, THEN save the image. For those really high detailed pages at the end of Burned Oak, I was saving them at 1200, even 1400 pixels high. It means they display larger on Deviantart, and gives better representation of the detail. Hope that makes sense :)
Reply
:iconbesnglist:
Ha! You're right! Million thanks man, it's not blur anymore! 72 dpi works! Thank you!!!!!!
Reply
:iconmoriadat:
~Moriadat Feb 19, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
Yeeeaaahhh, there ya go!
Reply
:icondiegotripodi:
Gorgeous as always, Jelena! The last 2 panels in particular, I think they are among your finest...! :iconclappingplz:
Reply
Add a Comment: